PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM JUDICIAL REVIEW DI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI SEBAGAI WUJUD MENGUATKAN PRINSIP NEGARA HUKUM KESEJAHTERAAN
Abstract
Society participation is an important discourse to study, especially in the paradigm of a democratic rule of law which principally requires society involvement in its implementation. Of course this implementation also includes the formation of laws, where the community has a crucial position to be involved in ensuring that laws achieve their ideal goal of prosperity. However, in the current dynamics of enactment of laws it seems to be a manipulative process, for purposes that are contrary to good intentions. When such conditions occur, society can use constitutional means to evaluate laws that have the potential to violate their rights through judicial review. Therefore this research wants to examine society participation in judicial review at the Constitutional Court as a form of strengthening the principle of a welfare state. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statute approach. The results of this study concluded that the state is responsible for ensuring the welfare of every citizen. To achieve this welfare requires a law to regulate it. However, if the law produced by the state government is far from aiming to prosper, then the society can take a role by filing a request for judicial review at the Constitutional Court. The activity of filing a request for judicial review is an effort for the society to actively participate in evaluating laws to strengthen the principle of a welfare state which has the basic idea that every legal product must have an aspirational element for the society.
Downloads
References
Jemadu, Aleksius. (2008). Politik Global dalam Teori & Praktik, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.
Dayanto. (2015). Peraturan Daerah Responsif: Fondasi Teoretik dan Pedoman Pembentukannya, Deepublish, Yogyakarta.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2012). Perkembangan & Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Mahfud MD, Moh. (2014). Politik Hukum di Indonesia, Rajawali Press, Jakarta.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2012). Ilmu Hukum, Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung.
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Mamudji, Sri. (1985). Penelitian Hukum Nоrmatif, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Subekti, Valina Singka. (2015). Dinamika Konsolidasi Demokrasi: Dari Ide Pembaruan Sistem Politik hingga ke Praktik Pemerintahan Demokratis, Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, Jakarta.
Jurnal:
Kurniawan, Alek Karci. (2014). Judicial Preview Sebagai Mekanisme Verifikasi Konstitusionalitas Suatu Rancangan Undang-Undang, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 11, No. 4.
Bisariyadi. (2016). Pergulatan Paham Negara Kesejahteraan (Welfare State) dan Negara Regulasi (Regulatory State) dalam Perkara Konstitusional, Jurnal Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 23, No. 4.
Kiswanto, Eddy. (2005). Negara Kesejahteraan (Welfare State): Mengembalikan Peran Negara dalam Pembangunan Kesejahteraan Sosial di Indonesia, Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik, Vol. 9, No. 2.
Ari Yuliartini, Ni Made dan Anak Agung Sri Utari. (2008). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah. Jurnal Kertha Patrika, Vol. 33, No. 1.
Hadiyono, V. (2020). Indonesia dalam Menjawab Konsep Negara Welfare State dan Tatangannya, Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Kekuasaan, Vol. 1, No. 1.
Ramadhan, Febriansyah dan Ilham Dwi Rafiqi. (2022). Menggali Asas-Asas Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia. Journal of Judicial Review, Vol. 24, No. 1.
Roza, Darmini dan Gokma Toni Parlindungan S. (2019). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pembentukan Perundang-Undangan Untuk Mewujudkan Indonesia Sejahtera dalam Pandangan Teori Negara Kesejahteraan. Jurnal Cendekia Hukum. Vol. 5, No. 1.
Peraturan Perudang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Lihat Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2011 Nomor 98, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4316).
Sumber Internet
CNN Indonesia. (2022). Daftar Pasal Bermasalah UU Ibu Kota Baru Nusantara. Cnnindonesia.com.
https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20220121125955-12-749527/daftar-pasal-bermasalah-uu-ibu-kota-baru-nusantara/2. Diakses pada 11 Juli, Pukul 18.21 WIB.
Dian Andryanto. (2023). Kritik Walhi terhadap Amdal di Perpu Cipta Kerja, Ini Pasal Bermasalah. Tekno tempo.com.
https://tekno.tempo.co/read/1677689/kritik-walhi-terhadap-amdal-di-perpu-cipta-kerja-ini-pasal-bermasalah. Diakses pada 11 Juli, Pukul 17.21 WIB.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Esensi Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this Journal agree to the following terms:
1. Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a creative commons attribution license that allow others to share the work within an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication of this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangement for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g. acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal).
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published works.
4. 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2.png)
