Penerapan Doktrin Kerugian (Schadevergoeding) Perjanjian Kerja Sama Pembangunan dan Pengelolaan Lahan Perumahan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 3179 K/Pdt/2021)

  • Vania Athalia Lumban Tobing Fakultas Hukum UPN "Veteran" Jakarta
  • Audrey Rasya Novianto Putri Fakultas Hukum UPN “Veteran” Jakarta
  • Naziva Azzahra Rahman Rahman Fakultas Hukum UPN “Veteran” Jakarta
  • Belina Sascika Manalu Fakultas Hukum UPN “Veteran” Jakarta
  • Zahwa Cantika Putri Rafian Fakultas Hukum UPN “Veteran” Jakarta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35586/esensihukum.v7i2.525

Abstract

Abstract 

Default of performance in property development partnership agreements frequently results in substantial material losses and prolonged legal disputes, as evidenced in Supreme Court Decision Number 3179 K/Pdt/2021, which ruled on breach of contract arising from the failure to issue land certificates. This study aims to analyze the application of the doctrine of damages (schadevergoeding) in cases of default concerning partnership agreements for residential land development and management, as well as to examine the legal considerations of judges in assessing losses suffered by capital investors. This research adopts a normative juridical approach employing three methods: case study approach, conceptual approach, and statutory approach. Data is analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-analytical techniques to elaborate and examine findings in accordance with the theoretical framework and applicable legal provisions. The research findings demonstrate that the doctrine of damages constitutes a fundamental legal instrument obligating debtors to compensate for both material and immaterial losses based on the principles of restitutio in integrum and pacta sunt servanda. The Supreme Court corrected the decision of the judex facti, which overly emphasized formal aspects, by prioritizing substantive justice in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Code. The application of this doctrine provides legal protection for aggrieved parties and maintains trust in property business relationships in Indonesia.

Keywords: Schadevergoeding, Breach of Contract, Cooperation Agreement, Compensation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku

Risdiana, R., Ari, M. A., Sulaeman, D., Priyono, E. A., Wulandari, E., Rochmiyatun, S., … Rosnida, R. (2025). Pengantar hukum perdata. Yogyakarta: CV Edu Akademi.

Setiawan, I. K. O. (2021). Hukum Perikatan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Yahman. (2017). Karakteristik wanprestasi & tindak pidana penipuan. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Jurnal

Arafah, Z. N., & Syafwar, R. (2024). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap gugatan kabur (obscuur libel) dalam kasus wanprestasi penanaman modal usaha pada PT arasy mulia utama. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik,2(1), 95–100. doi:10.62379/ptp4k515

Azzahra, V. F., Ivanicevic, J., Huda, G. R., Sianturi, C. R., Simanjuntak, C. Z. R., & Ramadhani, D. A. (2024). Analisis Putusan Hakim Dalam Gugatan Wanprestasi Perjanjian Utang Piutang Modal Usaha. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI),2(3), 188-196. doi:10.5281/zenodo.11627498

Hapsari, R. A., Hesti, Y., & Mahari, I. S. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Wanprestasi yang Dilakukan Debitur Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen (Studi Putusan Nomor: 60/Pdt.G/2021/PN Tjk). Case Law,4(1), 1-20. doi:10.25157/caselaw.v4i1.2689

Harmono, H. & Rasji. (2024). Problematika Pertimbangan Hukum Oleh Hakim dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan di Masyarakat. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis,5(10), 1-19. doi:10.56370/jhlg.v5i10.939

Iwanti, N. A. M. & Taun. (2022). Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi Serta Upaya Hukum Wanprestasi Berdasarkan Undang-undang Yang Berlaku. The Juris,6(2), 361–351. doi:10.56301/juris.v6i2.601

Nadhifah, R. B., & Putra, M. F. M. (2023). Wanprestasi Perjanjian Kerjasama Pembangunan Perumahan Oleh Pengembang Terhadap Pemilik Tanah di Kota Padang (Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Padang Nomor 194/PDT/2022/PT PDG). Gorontalo Law Review,6(2), 421–429. doi:10.32662/golrev.v6i2.2843

Purba, M., & Habeahan, B. (2024). Tinjauan yuridis akibat hukum terhadap debitur atas gugatan eror in persona yang diajukan kepada kreditur. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research,4(6), 6163–6174. doi:10.31004/innovative.v4i6.16569

Sianturi, C. R., Aria, M. G., Choirunnisa, A. N., Nahriva, A. Z., & S, Surahmad. (2024). Efek Hukum Perubahan Serta Pembatalan Kontrak; Tinjauan Dari Perspektif Hukum Perikatan. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI),2(4), 326-331. doi:10.5281/zenodo.14192185

Sinaga, N. A. (2018). Peranan asas-asas hukum perjanjian dalam mewujudkan tujuan perjanjian. Binamulia Hukum,7(2), 107–120. doi:10.37893/jbh.v7i2.318

Suganda, M. A. & Rasji. (2025). Pengaturan Bentuk Dan Kualifikasi Wanprestasi Akibat Ketidaksesuaian Objek Tanah Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum,13(10), 2241–2249. doi:10.24843/KS.2025.v13.i10.p06

Syamsiah, D., Bao, R. M. B., & Yuliana, N. F. (2023). Dasar penerapan asas pacta sunt servanda dalam perjanjian. Jurnal Hukum Das Sollen,9(2), 841–848. doi:10.32520/das-sollen.v9i2.2988

Tanjaya, W., Heriyanti, & Wijaya, E. T. (2025). Tinjauan Hukum Tentang Penerapan Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Dalam Hukum Bisnis Terhadap Penyelesaian Kasus Wanprestasi. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia,9(2), 261–267. doi:10.31933/rynrzt05

Turagan, A. F. (2019). Pelaksanaan perjanjian dengan itikad baik menurut pasal 1338 kuhperdata. Lex Privatum,7(1), 46-51.

Website

Tim Hukumonline. Pengertian Wanprestasi, Akibat, dan Penyelesaiannya. Available from https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/unsur-dan-cara-menyelesaikan-wanprestasi-lt62174878376c7/. (Diakses 10 April 2025)

Yasin, M. Peradilan yang Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan. Available from https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/peradilan-yang-sederhana--cepat--dan-biaya-ringan-lt5a7682eb7e074/. (Diakses 28 November 2025)

Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Published
2026-06-11
How to Cite
Lumban TobingV. A., Novianto PutriA. R., RahmanN. A. R., ManaluB. S., & RafianZ. C. P. (2026). Penerapan Doktrin Kerugian (Schadevergoeding) Perjanjian Kerja Sama Pembangunan dan Pengelolaan Lahan Perumahan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 3179 K/Pdt/2021). Esensi Hukum, 7(2), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.35586/esensihukum.v7i2.525
Issue
Vol 7 No 2 (2025): Desember - Jurnal Esensi Hukum
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2026 Esensi Hukum

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this Journal agree to the following terms:

1. Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a creative commons attribution license that allow others to share the work within an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication of this journal.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangement for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g. acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal).

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published works.

4. Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.